The evolution of contract law in the context of the digitalization of social relationships

Autores/as

  • Hanna Potapchuk Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine
  • Yuliia Rud Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
  • Iurii Rega Institute of Humanities, National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine
  • Valentyna Medzhbel Interregional Academy of Personal Management
  • Nataliia Petrova Sumy National Agrarian University

Palabras clave:

Contract Law, Digitization, Electronic Contract, Smart Contract, e-Commerce, Digital Identification, Blockchain, Digital Economy, Legal Regulation

Resumen

The significance of this study lies in the rapid digitization of social relations, which is transforming traditional approaches to concluding, enforcing, and terminating contracts, and shaping new models of economic interaction in the digital environment. The expansion of e-commerce, digital platforms, electronic identification, and blockchain technologies necessitates a reconsideration of classical legal constructs of contract law, originally developed within paper-based systems and geographically limited legal frameworks. In the digital economy, ensuring legal certainty of electronic transactions, protecting the rights of participants, and harmonizing national regulations with international standards become essential. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative doctrinal analysis of how international, European Union and Ukrainian legal frameworks regulate selected dimensions of digital contracting, namely electronic consent, digital identification, evidentiary mechanisms, automated contractual performance and algorithmic liability. The study does not seek to provide an exhaustive theory of the evolution of contract law as a whole. Instead, it focuses on a limited set of legal instruments and analytical criteria in order to identify regulatory convergences, gaps and directions for further legal development. It examines legal mechanisms governing electronic and smart contracts, as well as digital expressions of intent. The findings indicate that digitalization does not eliminate core principles of contract law but transforms their implementation through integration with digital infrastructures, enhancing legal efficiency and regulatory adaptability.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

BEDRATYI, I., SHEVCHSYHYN, O., and ASTAKHOV, V. “Legal aspects of intellectual property rights violation in the digital environment: Prospects of recodification”. Social Development: Economic and Legal Issues, 2025, pp. 4. https://doi.org/10.70651/3083-6018/2025.4.09

BROWNSWORD, R., YEUNG, K., and SCOTFORD, E. The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27999 (accessed on 26 August 2026).

CLACK, C. D., BAKSHI, V. A., and BRAINE, L. “Smart contract templates: Foundations, design landscape and research directions”. arXiv. 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.00771

DE CARIA, R. “The legal meaning of smart contracts”. European Review of Private Law, v. 26, n. 6, pp. 731-751. https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2018052

DE FILIPPI, P., and WRIGHT, A. Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2867sp

DELOITTE. E-signing: The Market Size and Vendor Landscape. 2021. Available at: https://www.deloitte.com/ch/en/services/consulting/blogs/e-signing-market-size-and-vendor-landscape.html (accessed on 26 August 2026).

DZERA, O. V. Civil Law of Ukraine: General Part. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. 2018.

E XPLODING TOPICS. Electronic signature statistics and trends. 2023. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/esignature-stats (accessed on 22 August 2026).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Shaping Europe's digital future. 2020. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/communication-shaping-europes-digital-future-feb2020_en_4.pdf (accessed on 29 August 2026).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. eIDAS Regulation. 2022. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation (accessed on 28 August 2026).

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL. Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions in the Internal Market (eIDAS). 2014. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/910/oj (accessed on 25 August 2026).

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL. Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 (Data Act). 2023. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2854/oj (accessed on 30 August 2026).

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL. Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 on European Digital Identity. 2024a. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1183/oj (accessed on 30 August 2026).

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) 2024b. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj (accessed on 30 August 2026).

FLORIDI, L., COWLS, J., BELTRAMETTI, M., CHATILA, R., CHAZERAND, P., and DIGNUM, V., et al. “AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations”. Minds and Machines, v. 28, n. 4, 2018, pp. 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

LESSIG, L. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books. 2006. https://archive.org/details/Code2.0 (accessed on 27 August 2026).

LUESLEY, A. “Unravelling smart contracts: Smart contracts and the law of rescission in Canada”. Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, v. 19, 2019, pp. 155-173. Available at: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/asperreview/index.php/asperreview/article/view/223 (accessed on 29 August 2026).

MIK, E. “Smart contracts: Terminology, technical limitations and real world complexity”. Law, Innovation and Technology, v. 9, n. 2, 2017, pp. 269-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468

POHORETSKYI, M. “The impact of the legal positions of The Supreme Court on the formation of the doctrine and practice of criminal procedural evidence law in Ukraine”. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 4, n. 32, 2025, pp. 260-290. https://doi.org/10.31359/1993-0909-2025-32-4-260

RADIN, M. J. Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282678188_Boilerplate_The_fine_print_vanishing_rights_and_the_rule_of_law (accessed on 27 August 2026).

RASKIN, M. “The law and legality of smart contracts”. Georgetown Law Technology Review, v. 1, n. 2, 2017, pp. 305-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842258

REIJERS, W., WUISMAN, I., MANNAN, M., DE FILIPPI, P., WRAY, C., and RAE-LOOI, V., et al. “Now the code runs itself: On-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies”. Topoi, v. 40, n. 4, 2021, pp. 821-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9626-5

SAVELYEV, A. “Contract law 2.0: Smart contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law”. Information & Communications Technology Law, v. 26, n. 2, 2017, pp. 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1301036

SKLAROFF, J. M. “Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166, 2017, pp. 263-303. Available at: https://access.heinonline.com/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/pnlr166&div=8&id=&page= (accessed on 20 August 2026).

SKYQUEST TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING. Digital Signature Market Report. 2024. Available at: https://www.skyquestt.com/report/digital-signature-market (accessed on 20 August 2026).

SZABO, N. “Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks”. First Monday, v. 2, n. 9. 1997. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548

UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. United Nations. 1996. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_commerce (accessed on 26 August 2026).

UNCTAD. Digital Economy Report 2021. United Nations. 2021. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2026).

UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). 1980. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale

_of_goods/cisg (accessed on 25 August 2026).

UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts. 2005. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org (accessed on 25 August 2026).

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Law of Ukraine "On Electronic Documents and Electronic Document Flow" No. 851-IV. 2003. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851-15 (accessed on 30 August 2026).

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Law of Ukraine "On Electronic Commerce" No. 675-VIII. 2015. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/675-19 (accessed on 30 August 2026).

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Law of Ukraine "On Electronic Trust Services" No. 2155-VIII. 2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155-19 (accessed on 30 August 2026).

VEALE, M., and ZUIDERVEEN BORGESIUS, F. “Demystifying the draft EU artificial intelligence act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach”. Computer Law & Security Review, v. 22, n. 4, 2021, pp. 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402

VON WENDLAND, M. “Smart contracts that are smart and can function as legal contracts”. arXiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.01279

WERBACH, K., and CORNELL, N. “Contracts ex machina”. Duke Law Journal, v. 67, n. 2, 2017, pp. 313-382. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol67/iss2/2/ (accessed on 30 August 2026).

Descargas

Publicado

30-09-2026

Cómo citar

“The evolution of contract law in the context of the digitalization of social relationships” (2026) Cadernos de Dereito Actual, (33), pp. 210–239. Available at: https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1528 (Accessed: 30 September 2026).