Strategies for modernizing administrative law to strengthen the fight against cybercrime
Palabras clave:
Administrative Law, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Digital Space, Legal ModernizationResumen
This article aims to evaluate and synthesize contemporary scholarly approaches to modernizing administrative law to prevent cybercrime, identify effective tactics, and clarify the pedagogical value of those tactics within legal education. The PRISMA framework guided the selection of pertinent literature, yielding 53 records screened on thematic, chronological, and methodological grounds. Sources span 2019 to 2025 and represent scholarships from North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region. Each record was assessed for relevance, methodological rigor, and contribution to the evolving discourse on cyber-legal governance, and appraisal followed accepted evidence-grading protocols. Thematic analysis then structured the evidence. The findings show a pressing need to reform state institutions by establishing specialized cyber units capable of responding rapidly to digital threats. The study further indicates that the effectiveness of cybercrime countermeasures depends on the adaptability and currency of legal norms, underscoring the need to align domestic legislation with international standards. Incorporating emerging technologies, especially artificial intelligence, appears promising for enhancing law enforcement performance and enriching legal curricula. Overall, the research concludes that an effective response to cybercrime requires an integrated strategy that unites legal modernization, technological innovation, and cross-sector collaboration. Such synergy safeguards citizens and key infrastructure worldwide.
Descargas
Referencias
AL-AMAIREH, Monther Abed-Alrazzaq Musleh. The Role of Cybersecurity in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Law Against Cybercrimes. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental. 2024, 18(8), e06508. DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-124.
ALLAH RAKHA, Naeem. Cybercrime and the Law: Addressing the Challenges of Digital Forensics in Criminal Investigations. Mexican Law Review. 2024, 23–54. DOI: 10.22201/iij.24485306e.2024.2.18892.
BATRACHENKO, Tetiana, et al. Cybercrime in the context of the digital age: analysis of threats, legal challenges and strategies. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. 2024, 6, 2024ss0212. DOI: 10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0212.
BOUSTA, Rhita, and Yseult MARIQUE. Taking Comparative Administrative Law (Almost) Seriously? Comparative Administrative Law in French & Belgium Legal Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2711289.
BREWER, Russell, et al. Universal Communication Strategies. Cybercrime Prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 35–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31069-1_3.
BRODOWSKI, Dominik. The Role of Criminal Law in Regulating Cybercrime and IT Security. In: Law and Technology in a Global Digital Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 233–255. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90513-2_12.
BUÇAJ, Enver, and Kenan IDRIZAJ. The need for cybercrime regulation on a global scale by the international law and cyber convention. Multidisciplinary Reviews. 2024, 8(1), 2025024. DOI: 10.31893/multirev.2025024.
BUSSER, Els De. EU-US Digital Data Exchange to Combat Financial Crime: Fast is the New Slow. German Law Journal. 2018, 19(5), 1251–1267. DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023026.
CATOTA, Frankie E., M. Granger MORGAN, and Douglas C. SICKER. Cybersecurity education in a developing nation: the Ecuadorian environment. Journal of Cybersecurity. 2019, 5(1). DOI: 10.1093/cybsec/tyz001.
CHERNIAVSKYI, Serhii, et al. Measures to combat cybercrime: analysis of international and Ukrainian experience. Cuestiones Políticas. 2021, 39(69), 115–132. DOI: 10.46398/cuestpol.3969.06.
CHRISTOU, George. The challenges of cybercrime governance in the European Union. European Politics and Society. 2018, 19(3), 355–375. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1430722.
COLLIER, Ben, et al. Influence, infrastructure, and recentering cybercrime policing: evaluating emerging approaches to online law enforcement through a market for cybercrime services. Policing and Society. 2021, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2021.1883608.
Council of Europe (COE): Convention on Cybercrime. International Legal Materials. 2002, 41(2), 282–302. DOI: 10.1017/s0020782900009918.
DANYLENKO-NEHARA, Yuliia, et al. The ethical aspect of public administration under special regime and sustainable development. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología-Serie de Conferencias. 2024, 3. DOI: 10.56294/sctconf2024.755.
DEWI SURYANDARI, Wieke. Efforts to Reform Law Enforcement in Tackling Cybercrime. International Journal of Law Social Sciences and Management. 2024, 1(2). DOI: 10.69726/ijlssm.v1i2.27.
DIOP, Serigne Mouhamadane, et al. To Coerce or Not to Coerce? A Quantitative Investigation on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Legislations Towards Large-Scale Vulnerability Notifications. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW). 2019. DOI: 10.1109/issrew.2019.00085.
DUPONT, Benoît. Enhancing the effectiveness of cybercrime prevention through policy monitoring. Journal of Crime and Justice. 2019, 42(5), 500–515. DOI: 10.1080/0735648x.2019.1691855.
ELEGBE, Ifeoluwa. Cybercrime legislation: a comparative analysis of legal frameworks, policy responses and recommendations. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research. 2024, 07(02), 199–207. DOI: 10.37500/ijessr.2024.7211.
ERIKHA, Annisa, and Ade SAPTOMO. Dilemma of Legal Policy to Address Cybercrime in the Digital Era. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities. 2024, 3(3), 499–507. DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i3.452.
FLOR, Roberto, and Beatrice PANATTONI. Digital criminal investigations in Italy. The intersection between data protection and cybersecurity. New Journal of European Criminal Law. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/20322844231212836.
FORTES, Vinícius Borges, and Salete Oro BOFF. An analysis of cybercrimes from a global perspective on penal law. Revista Brasileira de Direito. 2017, 13(1), 7–24. DOI: 10.18256/2238-0604/revistadedireito.v13n1p7-24.
GILBERT, Chris, and Mercy Abiola GILBERT. Bridging the Gap: Evaluating Liberia’s Cybercrime Legislation Against International Standards. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. 2024, IX(X), 131–147. DOI: 10.51584/ijrias.2024.910013.
GOLOVIN, Dmytro. Electronic evidence in proving crimes of drugs and psychotropic substances turnover. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2022, 5(2), 1–13. DOI: 10.33327/ajee-18-5.2-n000217.
GUMZEJ, Nina, and Nikola PROTRKA. Evaluation of Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Croatia with a Focus on Preservation Requirements and Role of Standard Operative Procedures. In: 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication, and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). 2021. DOI: 10.23919/mipro52101.2021.9597136.
HASANOVA, Ilhama Zakir kizi. The Role of the Advocate’s Motions and Complaints in a Criminal Trial: A Scoping Review. Futurity Economics&Law. 2024, 4(4), 25–41. DOI: 10.57125/fel.2024.12.25.02.
ILYINA, Anastasiya. Mechanism of Innovation and Investment Development in Modern Economy. Economic Affairs. 2022, 67(4s). DOI: 10.46852/0424-2513.4s.2022.16.
KAVYN, Sviatoslav, Ivan BRATSUK, and Anatoliy LYTVYNENKO. Regulatory and Legal Enforcement of Cyber Security in Countries of the European Union: The Experience of Germany and France. Teisė. 2021, 121, 135–147. DOI: 10.15388/teise.2021.121.8.
KHALYMON, S., and A. PRYTULA. Problems of implementation of whistleblower institution. Ukraine Juridical Tribune Journal. 2019, 9(2), 436–454. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v9y2019i2p436-454.html (accessed on 09 August 2025).
MEENA, Shiv Ram. Sparseness Controlled Proportionate RLS Algorithm for Sparse and Non-Sparse Systems. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications. 2024, 15(05), 6101–6108. DOI: 10.35444/ijana.2024.15504.
MENSAH, Ebenezer Kojo Gyesi. Investigating International Criminal Law and Sovereignty Issues Surrounding the Prosecution of Heads of State for War Crimes and Genocide. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4813323.
NEWHOUSE, William, et al. National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, August 2017. DOI: 10.6028/nist.sp.800-181.
NGET, Makara, et al. Cybercrime’s Global and National Dimensions: Policy Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Solutions. Law and Humanities Quarterly Reviews. 2024, 3(4). DOI: 10.31014/aior.1996.03.04.132
NOWACKI, Jeffrey, and Dale WILLITS. An organizational approach to understanding police response to cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal. 2019, 43(1), 63–76. DOI: 10.1108/pijpsm-07-2019-0117.
NUGROHO, Agus, and An An CHANDRAWULAN. Research synthesis of cybercrime laws and COVID-19 in Indonesia: lessons for developed and developing countries. Security Journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1057/s41284-022-00357-y.
ODERIY, Oleksiy, et al. The Impact of EU Criminal Law Policy on the Prevention of Transnational Environmental Crime. Pakistan Journal of Criminology. 2024, 16(3), 1155–1172. DOI: 10.62271/pjc.16.3.1155.1172.
OLIINYK, Olena, et al. Criminal legal and administrative methods of ensuring the economic security of the state in the context of globalization and modernization of the economy. International Journal of Agricultural Extension. 2022, 10(2), 91–103. DOI: 10.33687/ijae.010.00.3867.
PITTIGLIO, Rosanna, et al. Cybersecurity, Personal Data Protection and Crime Prevention from an Italian Perspective. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 131–156. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_7.
RAAIJMAKERS, Stephan. Artificial Intelligence for Law Enforcement: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Security & Privacy. 2019, 17(5), 74–77. DOI: 10.1109/msec.2019.2925649.
RENAUD, Karen, et al. Cyber Security Responsibilization: An Evaluation of the Intervention Approaches Adopted by the Five Eyes Countries and China. Public Administration Review. 2020, 80(4), 577–589. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13210.
ROY, Reena, and Anil Kumar DIXIT. Legal Framework of Cybercrimes against E-Banking in India. In: Cybersecurity, Law, and Economics. London: Routledge, 2024, pp. 69–90. DOI: 10.4324/9781003517290-7.
S. VITVITSKIY, Sergij, et al. Formation of a new paradigm of anti-money laundering: The experience of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2021, 19(1), 354–363. DOI: 10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.30.
SANNERHOLM, Richard. Rule of Law and Public Administration in Sweden. Law, Politics, Culture. Scandinavian studies in law. 2023, (2023 69), 231–250. DOI: 10.53292/32f26f7c.5b65be00.
SEMENETS-ORLOVA, Inna, et al. Organizational Development and Educational Changes Management in Public Sector (Case of Public Administration During War Time). International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023, 8(4), e01699. DOI: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1699.
SERGEYEV, Yuriy. Ukrainian Supreme Court Judicial Practice in Cases Arising from Disputes between Foreign Shipowners or Protection and Indemnity Clubs, and Seafarers or Seafarers’ Next of Kin. Lex Portus. 2024, 10(3). DOI: 10.62821/lp10303.
SHEVCHUK, O., et al. The Rights to access to Information and National Security in the Ukraine in the System of Human Rights. Revista Juridica Portucalense. 2023, 34, 257–282. Available at: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/juridica/article/view/31229 (accessed on 09 August, 2025).
SIAGIAN, Erwin Sondang. Public-private partnerships in Indonesia: a comprehensive legal framework of significance to action and analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 2017, 39(1), 72–78. DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2017.1294395.
SMAILOV, Nurzhigit, et al. Streamlining Digital Correlation-Interferometric Direction Finding with Spatial Analytical Signal. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska. 2024, 14(3), 43–48. DOI: 10.35784/iapgos.6177.
SORBÁN, Kinga. The role of Internet intermediaries in combatting cybercrime: Organisation and liabilities. Central and Eastern European edem and egov Days. 2022, 335, 19–31. DOI: 10.24989/ocg.v335.1.
STURC, Boris, Tatyana GUROVA, and Sergei CHERNOV. The Specifics and Patterns of Cybercrime in the Field of Payment Processing. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. 2022, 9, 2021–2030. DOI: 10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.237.
SVIATUN, Olena V., et al. Combating cybercrime: economic and legal aspects. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS. 2021, 18, 751–762. DOI: 10.37394/23207.2021.18.72.
United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report. Www.unodc.org. 2021. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021.html (accessed on 09 August 2025).
VULETIĆ, Igor. Criminal Law and the Challenges of Autonomous Intelligence: Substituting a Theory of Guilt with the Division of Labor. In: The Law and Economics of Patent Damages, Antitrust, and Legal Process. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021, pp. 111–126. DOI: 10.1108/s0193-589520210000029007.
WANG, Shun-Yung Kevin, et al. Collaboration between Law Enforcement Agencies in Combating Cybercrime: Implications of a Taiwanese Case Study about ATM Hacking. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2020, 0306624X2095239. DOI: 10.1177/0306624x20952391.
YERJANOV, Timur Keldeshevich, et al. Legal Issues Related to Combating Cybercrime: Experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2018, 8(7), 2286. DOI: 10.14505//jarle.v8.7(29).30.
ZYBIN, Serhii, et al. Approach of the Attack Analysis to Reduce Omissions in the Risk Management. Proceedings of Selected Papers of the Workshop on Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems (CPITS 2021), Kyiv, Ukraine, January 28, 2021, 2923, 318–328. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2923/paper35.pdf (accessed on 09 August, 2025).
ZYBIN, Serhii, et al. Blockchain technologies and their application in security software development. Sustainable Engineering and Innovation. 2025, 7(1), 209–224. DOI: 10.37868/sei.v7i1.id499.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Inna Pidbereznykh, Yevheniia Mykhailovska, Dmytro Kuzmin, Ruslan Ovcharenko, Stanislav Zlyvko
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los/las autores/as ceden todos sus derechos de autor a la revista Cadernos de Dereito Actual, la cual se encargará de difundir y citar siempre a su autor.
- Los autores/as se comprometen a no enviar el artículo o publicarlo en otra revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/las autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada, siempre que se haga referencia a Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
- Cadernos de Dereito Actual no se hace responsable por ninguno de los artículos publicados en caso de que el/la autor/autora hay incurrido en plagio o alguna política desleal a la hora de redactar y/o enviar su artículo. Cualquier responsabilidad civil o penal corresponderá, siempre, al autor/autora del artículo.
Todos los contenidos publicados en la revista están protegidos bajo una licencia "Creative Commons - Reconocimiento - No Comercial". Toda persona tiene derecho a acceder libremente a los contenidos de la revista.
